- #Is the integrated intel gma x4500 hd graphics sautered in Pc#
- #Is the integrated intel gma x4500 hd graphics sautered in series#
Bobcat CPUs were designed to be simpler, cut-down versions of standard AMD Athlons, with a targeted thermal envelope of 10W or less. Like Intel’s LGA1155/1156 platforms, the Northbridge portion of the chipset has been eliminated, with some functionality passed to the CPU and the rest consolidated with the Southbridge into the FCH (Intel calls their version PCH).
#Is the integrated intel gma x4500 hd graphics sautered in series#
With ATI’s graphics expertise, and no licensing deals to get in the way, AMD is perfectly poised to offer a cost effective alternative.Ĭonsolidating three chips into one, the AMD’s desktop APU has a TDP of only 18W.ĪMD calls the new platform “Brazos” - it is an APU (accelerated processing unit) containing a “Bobcat” CPU and a Radeon 6000 series GPU, with a FCH (Hudson Fusion Controller Hub).
Nvidia’s ION graphics for Atom is a successful solution, but it’s not cheap. This is a problem given the rapid deployment of HD video everywhere. Play Flash or anything better than standard definition video on an Atom based system and things bog down as the CPU chugs away, trying to handle decoding processes that it simply isn’t optimized for. The one thing Intel neglected to do was to produce a graphics chip for Atom capable of smoothly playing the multitude of video material now available to us. For people on the go, the superb energy efficiency also allows Atom PCs to be more mobile, as they can run unplugged for longer periods of time. This accounts for the success of Intel’s Atom processor, which is slow but fast enough for many people to get through an average day.
#Is the integrated intel gma x4500 hd graphics sautered in Pc#
The majority of modern PC users live and breathe on the web, and don’t need much horsepower. The market for AMD’s first Fusion products is less upscale but relatively strong. The first wave of Fusion products are designed not to compete with Intel in supplementing mainstream desktop computing power with integrated graphics. Sandy Bridge not only extended Intel’s mid to high-end CPU performance and efficiency lead over AMD, but also integrated a surprisingly decent GPU onto the same chip. Also, it took so long for Fusion to arrive that Intel actually beat AMD to the punch. Unfortunately, GPU acceleration in general applications has had a slow adoption rate, making these new chips less versatile than we would have predicted five years ago. That was where the future was headed, and the future is finally here. Since AMD’s acquisition ATI in 2006, we’ve been waiting for a Fusion processor that combines a central processing unit and graphics processing unit on the same chip.